Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Hopkins v. John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Hopkins
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Byrd v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2010cv01058
Plaintiff:
Herman Byrd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, . Osapho, C Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Douglas Ashcroft v. State of Oregon, et al
as 09-35305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS ALLEN ASHCROFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, MARVIN FICKLE, MARY CLAIRE BUCKLEY and others
Muff et al v. Mack et al
as 2:2008cv01027
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Muff, Danny Thompson, II, Edward Hardy and others
Defendant:
Eddie Mack, Terry Collins and Robin Knab
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02000
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Simmons v. Gilson et al
as 1:2008cv01288
Plaintiff:
George Ellis Simmons
Defendant:
Kevin Gilson, John Sisson, . Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hopkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2008cv01319
Plaintiff:
David Hopkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Sewell v. Marion County Sheriff et al
as 5:2007cv00102
Plaintiff:
Edwin S Sewell
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff and Deputy David Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sewell v. Marion County Sheriff et al
as 6:2007cv00260
Plaintiff:
Edwin S Sewell
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff and Deputy David Hopkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
