Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. Isaac
as 24-50112
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David Isaac, Jr.
Garcia Cubas v. Garland
as 22-6204
Petitioner: OSMAN JOSE GARCIA CUBAS and DAVID ISAAC GARCIA CUBAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. David McGaha
as 21-4390
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID ISAAC MCGAHA
Kenneth Thompson, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-2602
Defendant / Appellee: JONEIGH S. KHALDUN, in her official capacity as Chief Medical Executive and Chief Deputy Director for Health, JOSEPH GASPER, in his offical capacity as Director of the Michigan State Police, DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Michigan Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID A. ARNDT, HAPPY LAW, DARLENE DOWLING THOMPSON and others
Thompson et al v. Whitmer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00428
Plaintiff: Rory C. Gutchak, Kenneth A Thompson, Deanna K. Leslie and others
Defendant: Robert Gordon, Joneigh S. Khaldun, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center et al
as 2:2019cv02011
Defendant: Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, NH Board of Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff: Dr. Jeffrey Isaacs and Jeffrey David Isaacs
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
David Barrera-Ramirez v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-60185
Petitioner: DAVID ISAAC BARRERA-RAMIREZ
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: David McGaha
as 16-9985
Movant: In re: DAVID ISAAC MCGAHA
:
In re: David Way
as 16-9086
Movant: In re: DAVID ISAAC WAY
:
US v. David Solomon
as 16-4190
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID ISAAC SOLOMON, a/k/a David Chityal
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?