Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pickett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Defendant:
Ronnie Barnett, Bo, Tammie McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tradewinds Logisitics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00141
Defendant:
Tradewinds Logisitics, Inc. and David Jackson
Plaintiff:
Lakenya Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gardella et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13678
Defendant:
David Jackson, Sgt. Russell, D. Brents and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Melvin and Howard Gardella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2014cv00333
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America et al v. American Roadway Logistics, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America , Scott Shreiner , Ronald David Jackson and others
Defendant:
American Roadway Logistics, Inc. , John Claxton and Heidi Claxton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. David Jackson
as 11-6089
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
James Jackson, Jr. v. Shelby County
as 10-5008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES DAVID JACKSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY
Jackson v. Shelby County Correctional Center
as 2:2009cv02728
Plaintiff:
James David Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Shelby County Correction Center et al
as 2:2009cv02524
Plaintiff:
James David Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correction Center, McElpath and Veasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
