Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Ervin Cable Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Stewart et al
as 2:2017cv12506
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller
Defendant:
Anthony Stewart, Heidi E Washington, Bruce Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clarke v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv10528
Plaintiff:
Sheila Clarke
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Anthony Stewart, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luke v. Lambert et al
as 1:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Krys Lambert , Andy Eby , Jennifer Shockley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv12185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Luke v. Eby et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Luke
Defendant:
Andy Eby, Jennifer Shockley, Krys Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler et al v. Genesee County Department of Community Mental Health et al
as 2:2012cv13151
Plaintiff:
Gemale Tyler , General Tyler , Napolean Tyler and others
Defendant:
Mount Morris, Township of , Officer John Doe I, Officer John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Seabolt et al
as 2:2010cv00836
Plaintiff:
Johnny Jones
Defendant:
Benjamin Seabolt, James Lott, Tawonna Woods-Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
