Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Jones v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00967
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCullough v. Laporte County Sheriffs et al
as 3:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Kevin K McCullough
Defendant:
Laporte County Sheriffs, Michigan City Police Dept, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. LaPorte County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Kevin K McCullough and Kevin Keith McCullough
Defendant:
LaPorte County Sheriffs Dept, Prosecuting Attorneys Office, David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00677
Plaintiff:
Kevin K McCullough
Defendant:
David Jones, Prosecuting Attorney and Michigan City Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
DAVID JONES
Respondent:
DAVID MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES and SWEENEY v. HENDRIX
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
DAVID JONES and CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yang v. Sensenig
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Cai Feng Yang
Defendant:
Lester Sensenig and Lester N. Sensenig
Not Classified By Court:
David Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. Lucas
as 2:2021cv01352
Petitioner:
Michael David Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Earnell Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Lucas
as 2:2020cv01672
Petitioner:
David Jones, Jr and Michael David Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Earnell Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Jones v. Rodney Cummings, et al
as 20-1898
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL J. KOPP, RODNEY J. CUMMINGS and STEPHEN KOESTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
