Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Gilligan v. Frakes et al
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Edward Paul Gilligan
Defendant:
Scott Frakes , Steven G Hammond , Kenneth Lauren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leslie Moore v. County of Butte, et al
as 11-18024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BUTTE, CITY OF CHICO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Coleman et al v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2011cv03189
Plaintiff:
Carl William Coleman and Joelle Wilson Coleman
Defendant:
County of Butte , Jake Hancock , John Angle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harper v. Lugbauer et al
as 3:2011cv01306
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ryan Lugbauer , W. B. Coyle, David Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Moore v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2010cv00713
Defendant:
County of Butte, City of Chico, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Kanive et al
as 3:2010cv05126
Plaintiff:
Steven Lynn Brooks
Defendant:
Roberta F. Kanive, Linda Curry, Frank Busichio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2009cv02892
Plaintiff:
Leslie Moore
Defendant:
City of Chico, County of Butte, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings et al v. Atherton Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Travis Cummings, John Strom, Richard Pemberton and others
Defendant:
Atherton Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
