Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
David Lane et al v. DeWALT Industrial Tool Co. et al
as 5:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
David Lane and Lorraine Anda
Defendant:
DeWALT Industrial Tool Co., Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Stanley Black and Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Sullivan, et al. v. Bannock County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Sullivan, Theodore James Sullivan, Robin Sullivan and others
Defendant:
Bannock County, Kootenai County, Elmore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv01022
Plaintiff:
David Lane
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Farhar v. Ontrak, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01987
Defendant:
Ontrak, Inc., Terren S. Peizer and Brandon H. LaVerne
Plaintiff:
Michael Farhar
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Alexander Yildrim
Petitioner:
Ibinabo Dick, David Lane, Detectives Endowment Association of the City of New York Annuity Fund and others
Nathan Hill v. State of California et al
as 8:2017cv00826
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, California Supreme Court, Sherri R. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lane v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv03008
Plaintiff:
David Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Charles Kinney v. Roger Boren, et al
as 16-17255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER W. BOREN and DAVID LANE
Kinney v. Boren et al
as 3:2016cv06505
Plaintiff:
Charles Kinney
Defendant:
Roger W. Boren and David Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frank v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyds London Syndicate 4141
as 2:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
David Lane Frank
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds London Syndicate 4141
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
