Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Hardy Storage Company, LLC v. 5 ACRES OWNED BY CHRISTOPHER AND TRICIA VAN ORDEN (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-37) et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Hardy Storage Company, LLC
Defendant:
5 ACRES OWNED BY CHRISTOPHER AND TRICIA VAN ORDEN (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-37), 5 ACRES OWNED BY ERIC BODLEY AND SHERYLL POE (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-38), 5 ACRES OWNED BY TAMMY LOVING (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308- 40); 2 ACRES OWNED BY GOKCE CAPITAL LLC (PARCEL ID NO. 02-308-45) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Wasanyi v. Aramark Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
David M. Wasanyi
Defendant:
Aramark Services Incorporated and Brittany Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
Acting Warden S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Segal v. Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv00267
Defendant:
David M. Thomas, Robert Palumbi, Jeremy S. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Scott S. Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wasanyi v. Trent
as 5:2020cv00225
Petitioner:
David M. Wasanyi
Respondent:
Berkeley County and George Trent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. Rymer
as 1:2019cv00146
Defendant:
David M Rymer
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scates v. Doe et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
David M Scates
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
