Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Deputy McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Glenn
as 2:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Lightfoot et al
as 2:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Lightfoot and Deputy Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Pochar et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Pochar and Sergeant Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Adams
as 2:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Branch et al
as 2:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Corporal Branch and Captain Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Lawson
as 2:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Major Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. McCoy et al
as 9:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff McCoy, Christine Onley, Patrick Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Doe
as 22-1496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Doe, Southampton Town Police Detective That Interviewed Plaintiff at Stony Brook Hospital, Steven Kessner, Esq, (Legal Aid), Jeremy Mis, Esq, (Legal Aid) and others
Defendant:
Allen Riley, Chairman NYS Commission Of Corrections, Thomas Loughren, Commissioner Of NYS Commission Of Corrections, Anthony Annucci, Commissioner Of Corrections And Community Supervision and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
