Cases 11 - 18 of 18
McDonald v. West Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Team (WESTNET) et al
as 3:2014cv04154
Defendant:
West Contra Costa Narcotics Enforcement Team , County of Marin and City of Mill Valley
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mallory v. Vacaville Police Department, et al.
as 2:2014cv01203
Plaintiff:
Jason Mallory
Defendant:
Vacaville Police Department, City of Vacaville, County of Solano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David McDonald v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David McDonald
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Diana V. Smith and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Type:
Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2008cv01696
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCDONALD
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, DIANA V. SMITH, PHILIP J. BECK and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Waller v. The City of Dallas et al
as 3:2008cv00728
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Waller and James Douglas Waller
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Jerry Loudermilk, David McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Issaquena and Warren Counties Land Company, LLC et al v. Warren County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 5:2007cv00106
Plaintiff:
Issaquena and Warren Counties Land Company, LLC , Gary K. Blakeney , Kenneth D. Blakeney and others
Defendant:
Paw Paw Island Land Co., Inc. , John Lindigrin , Paul E. Winfield and others
Counter_claimant:
Paw Paw Island Land Co., Inc. and John Lindigrin
Counter_defendant:
Marty Elrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
