Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Decota Brown v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office
as 21-6323
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MCMAHAN, BARRY L. OWENS and OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DECOTA BROWN
Brown v. Oconee County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2020cv03282
Defendant:
Oconee County Sheriff's Office, Barry L Owens and David McMahan
Plaintiff:
Decota Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGriff, Seibels & Williams v. Paul Sparks, et al
as 19-14208
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID MCMAHAN, J. GREGORY MCCOLLISTER, Gregory, Doyle, Calhoun & Rogers, LLC 49 Atlanta Street Marietta, GA 30060 770-442-1776, PAUL SPARKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MCGRIFF, SEIBELS & WILLIAMS INC.
McGriff, Seibels & Williams Inc v. Sparks et al
as 2:2019cv01196
Plaintiff:
McGriff, Seibels & Williams Inc
Defendant:
John Tanner, Darren Sonderman, Paul Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01059
Plaintiff:
Jermel Pope
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Prison Industries (Unicor), Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMahan v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02131
Plaintiff:
David McMahan
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMahan v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:14-cv-01196
Plaintiff:
David McMahan and Gilbert Jones & Sons Farm LLC
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
McMahan v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
David McMahan
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Capital Guardian Holding, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00078
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Capital Guardian Holding, LLC, D. Alan Boyer, Michael Fayed and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
