Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Moore v. Quick Med Urgent Care, LLC et al.
as 4:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
Quick Med Urgent Care, LLC, Quick Med Urgent Care of Youngstown, LLC and Quick Med Urgent Care of Cortland, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williamson v. Lorain County, et al.
as 1:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Mr. Harry Williamson and Harry Williamson
Defendant:
Lorain County, David Moore, Tom Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Derrick Smith, et al v. James Schiebner
as 22-1307
Petitioner / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH, EDDIE RYAN LEWIS, JOSEPH AMBROSE and others
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER
David Ermold, et al v. Kim Davis
as 22-5260
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID ERMOLD and DAVID MOORE
Defendant / Appellant:
KIM DAVIS, Individually
Moore #224339 v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00213
Petitioner:
David Moore #224339
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith #267009 et al v. Schiebner et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009, Eddie Ryan Lewis #616302, Joseph Ambrose #185357 and others
Respondent:
James Schiebner, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Javaar Grayson-Bey v. Southfield Police Department, et al
as 21-1021
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID MOORE, Officer, Southfield, MI Police Department, MICHAEL WOJCIECHOWSKI, Officer, Southfield, MI Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVAAR TYRONE GRAYSON-BEY
Moore v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
as 6:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Moore
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
