Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Doe v. Zheng et al
as 1:2025cv03435
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mei Yu Zheng, Yi Hui Zou, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bryan v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02083
Petitioner:
David Anthony Bryan
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bryan v. Leu
as 5:2022hc02011
Petitioner:
David Anthony Bryan
Respondent:
Warden D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14719
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID STEPHEN BRYAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allscripts Healthcare, LLC et al v. Ingenious Med, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03076
Defendant:
Brian Cregan, David L. Bryan and Ingenious Med, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. and Allscripts Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryan v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv05062
Plaintiff:
David John Bryan
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryan v. Hoffman, et al
as 15-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GUY BRYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFFMAN and DAVID TESSIER, Health Services Administrator CTCF
Cuartas et al v. Cogent Communications, Inc.
as 1:2014cv21429
Plaintiff:
Francisco Cuartas , David J. Bryan , Jonathan Martinez and others
Defendant:
Cogent Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abel et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Abel , Sherian Ackley , Robbie Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Abel et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00780
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Abel , Sherian Ackley , Robbie Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
