Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Hill v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
David Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Shane Evans, Jane Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hill v. Phillip Valdez
as 12-36048
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID TYLER HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
PHILLIP VALDEZ
ANDERSON et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
LUCY ANDERSON , JOHN ALONGIS , JAMES BAILEY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tyler v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2011cv14840
Plaintiff:
Michael David Tyler
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hill v. Wamble-Fisher et al
as 1:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
David Tyler Hill
Defendant:
Shell Wamble-Fisher, Richmond, Johanna K Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Tyler v. John Palakovich, et al
as 11-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID TYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN PALAKOVICH, PAUL T. DEAN and ATTY GEN PA
Tyler v. McBane et al
as 5:2010cv00859
Plaintiff:
David Tyler
Defendant:
Herschel McBane and Larry Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Valdez
as 1:2009cv00601
Petitioner:
David Tyler Hill
Respondent:
Phillip Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler et al v. Dallas County et al
as 3:2009cv01460
Plaintiff:
Ron Tyler, Sherry Tyler, Melania Tyler and others
Defendant:
Dallas County, Dallas County, Craig Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hau V Pham v. Christina Poulos et al
as 8:2008cv00867
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Civil Process Clerk Civil Process Clerk, Christina Poulos and others
Respondent:
Civil Process Clerk Civil Process Clerk
Plaintiff:
Hau V Pham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
