Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stompingbear v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00226
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, John Rodgers, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00257
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed, Steven L Rickettes and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell K Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. Kelly et al
as 5:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brenna Elkins and others
Plaintiff:
Barry G Aaron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Kelley et al
as 4:2018cv00827
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stompingbear v. Reed
as 6:2018cv06105
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Townsend v. Terry Murphy, et al
as 17-2783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacob James Townsend
Defendant - Appellee:
Terry Murphy, Water Treatment Supervisor, ADC Tucker Unit, Richard Romine, Water Treatment/Outside Maintenance Supervisor and David White, Warden, Tucker Unit
Martinez v. Magnus et al
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez
Defendant:
Benny Magnus, Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamner v. Kelley et al
as 5:2016cv00369
Plaintiff:
Charles E Hamner
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, David White, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
