Cases
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01163
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff: Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant: United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00382
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilkins et al v. Neo-Neon LED USA Holdings Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01260
Plaintiff: David Wilkins and Kurtis Hoeven
Defendant: Neo-Neon LED USA Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corpus v. Wilkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00235
Plaintiff: Andrew Corpus
Defendant: David Wilkins, Secretary, Department of Children and Families, Timothy J. Budz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Fresno Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00599
Plaintiff: Deon Wade
Defendant: Fresno Police Department, Fredrick Williams, Haywood Irving and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Anderson et al v. Greenwich Insurance Company
as 3:2008cv00679
Defendant: Greenwich Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Faye Anderson, Karen Wroten, Patty Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01394
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00531
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?