Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Young et al v. TS Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00056
Plaintiff:
David Young and Linda Young
Defendant:
TS Enterprises, Inc., Page Four Realty Company, LLC and Quadriga Art, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Young v. Robson, et al
as 09-4184
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN ROBSON, DANIEL BERTCH, BERTCH ROBSON and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellee:
GORDON DUVAL, GREGORY HANSEN and DUVAL HAWS & MOODY, P.C., FKA Duval Haws & Frei, FKA Duval Haws Moody & Frei
Atkinson-Young et al v. McLaurin et al
as 5:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Cherie Atkinson-Young and David Young
Defendant:
Sheila McLaurin, Ruhlin Company, MSPRC and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Young et al v. Bausch & Lomb Inc
as 2:2007cv03554
Plaintiff:
Kelley Young, Kelley Young, Kelley Young and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc, Bausch & Lomb Inc and others
Special Master:
Daniel Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv69992
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Young v. Robson et al
as 2:2007cv00643
Plaintiff:
David Young
Defendant:
Kevin Robson, Daniel Bertch, Bertch & Birch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Kim v. David & Young Co., et al
as 1:2001cv01311
Plaintiff:
Hyung Sun Kim
Defendant:
Leo Ring , Frank Ring and Michael Ring
Cross_claimant:
Leo Ring , Frank Ring and Michael Ring
Cross_defendant:
Leo Ring , Frank Ring and Michael Ring
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Leo Ring , Frank Ring and Michael Ring
Thirdparty_defendant:
David & Young Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
