Cases 1 - 10 of 1,079
Fitch et al v. Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sykes Fitch, Mark Mixon, Sherryreed Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners, Nathan Everett, Nina Griswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Fraser v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Laura Lawton Fraser
Defendant:
Wyman Davis Fraser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Tanua Wallace and Frankie Junior Jennings
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Tillman and Ronald L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Gloria Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Tony OBrian Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00204
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Davis, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
