Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Scott v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Larry S. Scott
Defendant:
Fuentes and Deangelo Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo M Bennett and Deangelo Bennett
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Maci Jackson, Branden Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dove v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Dove
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Christina Reagle, Jacqueline Mayes and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Snodey et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv10094
Plaintiff:
William Gene Snodey
Defendant:
R Valadez, Tom Dart, CCDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. USA
as 2:2023cv02189
Petitioner:
Deangelo Terrell Banks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON et al v. NEELEY et al
as 1:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO JOHNSON and SHANGRI STEVENS
Defendant:
ROBERT NEELEY and BONTEMPS TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
USA v. Deangelo Hampton
as 23-2386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANGELO HAMPTON
Garcia v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Deangelo M Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
