Cases 1 - 10 of 611
Albert St. Clair, Jr. v. DeAngelo Anthony, et al
as 24-11302
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST. CLAIR, JR.
Defendant:
DEANGELO M. ANTHONY, DEREK R. GULLEDGE, ERIC STROM and others
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenja Carmichael v. Eric Williams
as 24-1823
Petitioner:
Kenja Omari Deangelo Carmichael
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Darden v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Fuentes et al
as 1:2024cv02579
Plaintiff:
Larry S. Scott
Defendant:
Fuentes and Deangelo Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Cheetwood et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Thomas
Defendant:
Richard Cheetwood, William Calcutt, Matthew Medert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. 201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Marquez Calvin
Defendant:
201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Stokes et al.
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III, Chuck Banks and Chuckie Banks
Defendant:
Michael T. Stokes, C. Holycross, D. Deangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
