Cases 41 - 50 of 1,211
Thompson v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv13049
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Jodi DeAngelo, Paul Schreiber, Brittany McClain and others
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
CHAMBLIN GROUP REAL ESTATE VENTURES LLC et al v. PINA et al
as 2:2023cv22655
Defendant:
RAASHAUN CASEY, CESAR HUMBERTO PINA, JENNIFER ITTURALDE PINA and others
Plaintiff:
CHAMBLIN GROUP REAL ESTATE VENTURES LLC, DERIK DEANGELO, REISPEC DEVELOPMENTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
US v. Braxton Benton
as 24-4015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRAXTON DEANGELO BENTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sherfield v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01073
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Sherfield
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department and Pharmacists Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson-Brown v. USA
as 4:2023cv13153
Petitioner:
Michael Deangelo Johnson-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moses v. Lumpkin
as 23-50751
Petitioner / Appellant:
DeAngelo Donte Moses
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Bruce Armstrong and Jerry Sanchez
USA v. Marques Howard
as 23-13841
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUES DEANGELO HOWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
