Cases 1 - 10 of 45
DeJesus v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Alberto DeJesus
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeJesus v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04234
Plaintiff:
Scott DeJesus
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Felix Montero-Molina v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3551
Petitioner:
FELIX ARCADIO DEJESUS MONTERO-MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Martinez, Sr. et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11350
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr., Ana Martinez DeJesus, Yaritza Martinez DeJesus and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Dr. Carl Schmidt, Dr. Leigh Hlavaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruby-Ruiz v. Davidson County Criminal Court
as 3:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Ugenio Dejesus Ruby-Ruiz
Respondent:
Davidson County Criminal Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeJesus et al v. Harvey et al
as 4:2022cv12879
Plaintiff:
George DeJesus and Melvin DeJesus
Defendant:
William Harvey, Chester S. Romatowski, Romatowski Consulting & Investigations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez-Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00876
Petitioner:
Antonio Dejesus Perez-Martinez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dejesus v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv06362
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Anita Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dejesus v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jose Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Perez-Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00485
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonio Dejesus Perez-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
