Cases 91 - 100 of 1,431
Morales v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Henry DeJesus Morales
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Baraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivers v. Squires et al
as 1:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jane Rivers
Defendant:
Susan Squires and Jonathan DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00236
Petitioner:
ANTONIA DEJESUS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DEJESUS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03698
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DEJESUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dejesus v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company et al
as 6:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
FABIAN DEJESUS
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Esther Pagan Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DEJESUS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN DEJESUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Collins v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
Warden, Transport Officer 1 and Transport Officer 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital et al
as 7:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Samantha DeJesus
Defendant:
Bon Secours Community Hospital and Lyn Wessels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea Removal - Employment Discrimination
Holloman v. Hudson et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Holloman
Defendant:
Commissioner Monroe Hudson, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Warden Robert May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley et al v. Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Christopher Conley, William Bryce and Samuel DeJesus
Defendant:
Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
