Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kalim Muhammad v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., et al
as 23-14126
Plaintiff: KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant: WENDY'S OF BOWLING GREEN, INC., COWIN KNOWLES, CIARA DENNIS and others
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15501
Plaintiff: RICHARD DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentley et al v. Cobb County, GA
as 1:2023cv01827
Plaintiff: Steven Bentley, Gary Chastain, John Conniff, Jr. and others
Defendant: Cobb County, GA
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01174
Plaintiff: NICHOLE DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Muhammad et al v. Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff: Kalim A. R. Muhammad and Karima Lakssir Muhammad
Defendant: Wendy's of Bowling Green, Inc., Cowin Knowles, Ciara Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEMOSS v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv23014
Plaintiff: JOSHUA DEMOSS
Defendant: ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19632
Plaintiff: RICHARD DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11153
Plaintiff: MATTHEW ELBERT DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67980
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEMOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60558
Plaintiff: GARY DEMOSS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?