Cases 1 - 10 of 115
State of North Dakota et al v. United States Department of Interior, The et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of Montana, State of Texas and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified:
Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant:
Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ProNM Energy Inc. v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
ProNM Energy Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Debra Anne Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Falkirk Mining Company, The v. United States Department of the Interior, The et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Falkirk Mining Company, The
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
perkins et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON et al v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2023cv05154
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON, AMUUR MATIYN ZAAKIR EL TRUST, ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON ET AL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS HOLBROOK doing business as THOMAS HOLBROOK, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY C HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, EZIKE NGO D/B/A EZIKE BGO: ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as EZIKE NGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
