Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dee Dee Dallas Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stewart v. Dominicis et al
as 5:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Wayne Anthony Stewart
Defendant:
Jorge A. Dominicis, Jerry Boyle, Amie Fabah-Ezeogu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalcollo v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Justin Dalcollo
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Warden Brown, Alisha Curtwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Farby et al
as 6:2024cv06089
Plaintiff:
Dashawun Wright
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Farby, Corrections Officer Thomas, Corrections Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courtney Ealy v. Dee Dee Brookhart
as 23-3341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY EALY
Defendant / Appellee:
DEE DEE BROOKHART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
