Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. US Forest Service et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, MountainTrue, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
US Forest Service, US Fish and Wildlife Service, James Melonas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) et al
as 1:2024cv10332
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Lobstermen's Association, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), Gina Raimondo and Janet Coit
Amicus Curiae:
Pro Se Party Richard Strahan, Conservation Law Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chattooga Conservancy v The United States Forest Service, et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Chattooga Conservancy, Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant:
The United States Forest Service and Troy Waskey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Colorado Conservation Alliance et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv03294
Plaintiff:
Colorado Conservation Alliance, Christopher Jurney and Michael Clark
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission, Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Humane Society of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association, Inc. et al v. US Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv03258
Plaintiff:
Gunnison County Stockgrowers' Association, Inc., Colorado Cattleman's Association and Colorado Cattlemen's Association
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of Animals, WildEarth Guardians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION et al v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and MICHAEL CONNOR
Intervenor Defendant:
Twin Pines Minerals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 23-35299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 23-1093
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC. v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, JANET COIT and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
