Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Human Rights Defense Center v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Scott Frakes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 8:2019cv00559
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doubletap Defense, LLC v. Hornady Manufacturing Co.
as 8:2018cv00492
Plaintiff:
Doubletap Defense, LLC
Defendant:
Hornady Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 8:2018cv00247
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv03035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense
as 8:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hornady Manufacturing Company v. Heizer Firearms, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv03117
Defendant:
Central Holding Corp., Heizer Defense, LLC and Heizer Firearms, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hornady Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
