Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Burress v. Alabama, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01726
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Georgia, State of, Dade County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Dade County, Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
Dade County, Georgia, State of Georgia, DeKalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama, Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy T Buckner and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Coit Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeKalb County, Alabama et al v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2020op45209
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., n/k/a Actavis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County, Alabama and Town of Powell, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Hammonds v. Dekalb County, Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv01558
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hammonds
Defendant:
Dekalb County, Alabama , Jimmy Harris , Robert Theakston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in DeKalb County, Alabama et al
as 4:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A Temporary Right to Enter Upon Land in DeKalb County, Alabama, Kathy Diane Jernigan Pelly, Cassandra Alain Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 831
Bates v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 4:2011cv02183
Plaintiff:
Darren Bates
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, Marshall County, Alabama, Dekalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkle v. Attorney General of the State of Alabama et al
as 4:2009cv01205
Petitioner:
Paula Hinkle
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Dekalb County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
