Cases 21 - 29 of 29
City of Richmond v. Reichl et al
as 2:2017cv04656
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond
Defendant:
FRANK A REICHL, VINCENT J OPALEWSKI, BRIAN C STEPPIG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. Reichl et al
as 2:2017cv04659
Plaintiff:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Defendant:
FRANK A REICHL, VINCENT J OPALEWSKI, BRIAN C STEPPIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. Reichl et al
as MD/1:17-cv-01527
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl , Vincent J. Opalewski , Brian C. Steppig and others
City of Richmond v. Reichl et al
as VAE/3:17-cv-00416
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl , Vincent J. Opalewski , Brian C. Steppig and others
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore v. Reichl et al
as 1:2017cv01527
Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl, Vincent J. Opalewski, Brian C. Steppig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Richmond v. Reichl et al
as 3:2017cv00416
Plaintiff:
City of Richmond
Defendant:
Frank A. Reichl, Vincent J. Opalewski, Brian C. Steppig and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02687
Plaintiff:
Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority, CITY OF FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA, INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO., INC. and others
Defendant:
VINCENT J. OPALEWSKI, SOUTHERN IONICS, INC., C&S CHEMICALS (OF GEORGIA) INC. and others
Intervenor:
US Department of Justice and Lawrence McShane
Special Master:
DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH and JUDGE FAITH S. HOCHBERG
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
