Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
Michael Hill v. Denis McDonough
as 23-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis McDonough, Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Matt Nasuti v. Adrian Holm, et al
as 22-3537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matt Nasuti
Defendant / Appellee:
Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
