Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Alucious Williams, Jr. v. Denise Jackson
as 23-6079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALUCIOUS WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE JACKSON, PRESCOTT WILLIAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
AZAR EL v. HALE et al
as 1:2022cv00998
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL
Respondent:
JAXSON HALE and UNIT MANAGER DENISE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Brown et al
as 5:2022ct03364
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Defendant:
Sgt. Brown and Warden Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Joiner v. Denise Jackson
as 22-6996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DENISE JACKSON and CHAPLAIN T. STRATTON
Corbett v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03308
Plaintiff:
Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Venetia S. Outlaw, Mr. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azar El v. Hale et al
as 3:2022cv00372
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El
Respondent:
Jaxson Hale and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02126
Petitioner:
Steven Hunter
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Denise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joiner v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03216
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner
Defendant:
Warden Denise Jackson and Chaplain T. Stratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03190
Plaintiff:
Aluciors Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Denise Jackson, Prescott Williams, Correctional Officer Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Todd Ishee
as 22-6671
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, NCDPS Prisons Director, DENISE JACKSON, PRESCOTT WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
