Cases 1 - 10 of 42
BYRD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SHIELDS v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SHIELDS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE JEANIE, LT. VICTOR MOORE, SHERIFF GODFREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2017cv01094
Petitioner:
DERRICK ANTHONY ROGERS
Respondent:
KENNETH E. LASSITER and NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2017cv01017
Petitioner:
DERRICK ANTHONY ROGERS
Respondent:
KENNETH E. LASSITER and NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. BADWIN et al
as 1:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE ELIZABETH SMITH
Defendant:
BADWIN, NORTH CAROLINA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2016cv00930
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCELROY v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2015cv01034
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MCELROY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN-BEY v. SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2015cv00696
Petitioner:
JUAN FITZGERALD ALLEN-BEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FULLARD v. NORTH CAROLINA YADKIN COUNTY et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
REGINALD UNDERWOOD FULLARD
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA YADKIN COUNTY, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF ATF, ADCE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION/NCPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2013cv01135
Petitioner:
FRANKIE GRAHAM
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
