Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Robert Slack v. Department of the Army, et al
as 19-1914
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army, Agency and Department of the Army
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert L. Slack
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ozark Society v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 16-1952
Plaintiff:
Ouachita Watch League, Newton County Wildlife Association, Shawn Porter and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ozark Society
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Forest Service, Judith L. Henry, Forest Supervisor, Ozark-St. Fransis National Forests, Department of Agriculture and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peters v. Department of the Army
as 6:2015cv03017
Plaintiff:
Gwen Peters
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John McClung, et al v. Colonel Courtney Paul, et al
as 14-3463
Petitioner - Appellant:
John McClung and Kim McClung
Respondent - Appellee:
Colonel Courtney W. Paul, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Little Rock District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and United States Department of the Army
McClung et al v. Masset et al
as 1:2013cv00044
Plaintiff:
John McClung and Kim McClung
Defendant:
Glen A Masset and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
