Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cahill v. United States of America, The et al
as 1:2023cv15721
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean Cahill
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Central Intelligence Agency, Dept. of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cahill v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv13899
Plaintiff:
Patrick Sean Cahill
Defendant:
The United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, Dept of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Broadway v. United States Military et al
as 2:2022cv02152
Plaintiff:
Ellis Broadway, Jr
Defendant:
United States Military, Dept of Veterans Affairs, Dept of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. U.S. Dept of Defense
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
U.S. Dept of Defense
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Veal v. VA et al
as 1:2018cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Veal
Defendant:
VA , Dept of the Dept of Defense and JAG Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veal v. VA Healthcare et al
as 1:2016cv11120
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Veal
Defendant:
VA Healthcare and Dept. of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veal v. Dept of the Army et al
as 1:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Veal
Defendant:
Dept of the Army and Dept of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkinton, Cheryl v. President of the United States et al
as 3:2012cv00681
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Elkinton
Defendant:
President of the United States, U.S. Military, U.S. Dept. of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PAUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv00029
Defendant:
ARKANSAS BANK & TRUST, AT&T, DEPT OF DEFENSE and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
