Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Curtis Garner v. Philadelphia Prison System, et al
as 16-3283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS GARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, COMMISSIONER PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, WARDEN CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Donell Prince v. Thomas Aiellos, et al
as 14-1149
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
DONELL L. PRINCE
Defendant - Appellant:
SGT. THOMAS AIELLOS, badge #221, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack
Defendant - Appellee:
DET. W. INGLIMA, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack, DET. A. GUTIERREZ, individually and as police officer in Police Department, City of Hackensack, DET. A. FERRAOILI, individually and as police officer in Police Department, Cit of Hackensack and others
COOPER v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv07311
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH COOPER
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, DEPUTY WARDEN ADMINISTRATION and PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
CHERRY v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2009cv01499
Plaintiff:
HASSAN CHERRY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Craig Saunders v. Gwendolyn Bright, et al
as 08-1763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG SAUNDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
GWENDOLYN BRIGHT, JUDGE, MICHAEL AMMANN, DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR, SUSAN CARMODY, DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR and others
Craig Saunders v. Gwendolyn Bright, et al
as 08-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG DUVAL SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
GWENDOLYN BRIGHT, JUDGE, MICHAEL AMMANN, DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR, SUSAN CARMODY, DEPUTY COURT ADMINISTRATOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
