Cases 1 - 10 of 143
ROSA v. DEROSE
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ROSA
Defendant:
MICHAEL DEROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar Folk v. Prime Care Medical, et al
as 22-3293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant / Appellee:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, P.A. TANYA SCHISLER, LPN TOM TOOLAN and others
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON, PERRY COUNTY PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Omar Folk v. Prime Care Medical, et al
as 22-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant / Appellee:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON, PERRY COUNTY PRISON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DONBAUGH and MATTHEW LEGAL
Vasquez v. Haste et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, Lt. Tim Manwiller, Mike Pries and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barngetuny v. County Of Dauphin et al
as 4:2019cv01927
Defendant:
Dauphin C.O. Joshua Marshall, County Of Dauphin, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Barngetuny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. DeRose
as 2:2019cv04814
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lewis
Defendant:
Chris DeRose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv02249
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Chris DeRose and Richard L Nothwehr
Plaintiff:
Lamont Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartlett v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2018cv04718
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Chris DeRose, Maricopa County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Alan M Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Battisti et al
as 1:2018cv00674
Petitioner:
Eric Johnson
Respondent:
Battisti , Dominick DeRose , Jane Doe, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Omar Folk v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 18-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR SIERRE FOLK
Defendant - Appellee:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC, DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON, PERRY COUNTY PRISON and others
Defendant:
DR. MATTHEW LEGAL, COUNTY OF PERRY, DAUPHIN COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
