Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Adams v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Derrick Adams
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Inc. and TransUnion
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Adams et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Insurance Co Subscribing to Policy No UIGB1115P191200
as 2:2021cv03141
Plaintiff:
Derrick Adams and Melanie Adams
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London subscribing to policy number UIGB1115P191200, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Insurance Co Subscribing to Policy No UIGB1115P191200 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London subscribing to policy no UIGMHOL18 16638 02
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv63136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
ADAMS v. USA
as 4:2017cv00576
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DERRICK ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams et al v. Movage, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02628
Plaintiff:
Jevon Williams , Mitchell Martinez , Dimitrije Zivkovic and others
Defendant:
Movage, Inc. , Bajo Vujovic and Christian Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCRAY v. ADAMS et al
as 4:2016cv00574
Plaintiff:
MYRON M MCCRAY
Defendant:
DERRICK ADAMS, BRIAN BLAND, KELON MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Stetz-Hardin-Maiden et al
as 3:2016cv01680
Plaintiff:
Timothy Joseph Hardin
Defendant:
Jena-Lyn Rose Stetz-Hardin-Maiden, Melanie Anne Morris, Derrick Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. USA
as 1:2016cv03455
Petitioner:
Derrick Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
