Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Chambers v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Demarcus L. Chambers
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Derrick Thompson, Gabriel Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROSSY v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv04849
Plaintiff:
RICHARD GROSSY
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY, CITY OF NEWARK, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Thompson v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-20757
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES DERRICK THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Thompson v. Griffin
as 1:2014cv01641
Respondent:
Superintendent Patrick Griffin
Petitioner:
Derrick Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Maryam Lipkansky
as 14-669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Maryam N'ha Margo Lipkansky, City of New York and State of New York
Thompson v. Maryam N'ha Lipkansky et al
as 1:2013cv09209
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thompson
Defendant:
Maryam N'ha Margo Lipkansky, City of New York and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv02905
Petitioner:
Charles Derrick Thompson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv02972
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thompson
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Corrections, Marton F. Horn, Robert Cripps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hachadoorian et al
as 1:2010cv09482
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thompson
Defendant:
John Hachadoorian and Raymond Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Thompson v. Victor Almager
as 08-56658
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
VICTOR ALMAGER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
