Cases 21 - 30 of 54
GRACE v. ALAMANCE COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00755
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY, OFFICER Z. HULCHER, OFFICER CROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JERMAINE GRACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM, DOCTOR MARK HAZELRIGG, LT. WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Respondent:
ICE/HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS, SHERIFF/WARDEN OF STANLY COUNTY, DETECTIVE A. L. ALDRIDGE and others
Petitioner:
ZANNIE J. LOTHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aikens v. Putney et al
as 3:2019cv00390
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Aikens
Defendant:
Kerry Putney, Deborah Radisah, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
OFFICER M. D. MARTINEZ, G. ISENHOUR, 2 HOMICIDE DETECTIVES and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS ALVIN BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2018ct03295
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department, Charles H. Christopher, Jr., Bionca Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellamy v. Smith et al
as 5:2018ct03286
Defendant:
Ms. Augustand, Detective Bradly, Detective Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kwamaine Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
