Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,207
Charles Larry Crews, Jr. v. Rivian Automotive, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01524
Plaintiff: Charles Larry Crews, Jr.
Defendant: Rivian Automotive, Inc., Robert J. Scaringe, Claire McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Crews, Jr. v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff: Charles Larry Crews, Jr.
Defendant: RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., ROBERT J. SCARINGE, CLAIRE MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Janet Nelums v. John Waites
as 22-1223
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANET LOUISE NELUMS and CHRIS NELUMS
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. WAITES, United States Bankruptcy Court, Chief Judge an individual, JEFFREY M. TZERMAN LAW FIRM P.A., an individual, H. GUYTON MURRELL, Scott and Corley, P.A H., an Individual and others
The Reckstin Family Trust v. C3.ai, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01413
Plaintiff: The Reckstin Family Trust, Dennis Martinez, Christie Sweeney and others
Defendant: C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Siebel, David Barter and others
Petitioner: Yining Cai, Leonard Janos, Fadi Karnaby and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
David Goad v. Ronaldo Reyes, et al
as 22-55194
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID GOAD
Defendant / Appellee: RONALDO R. REYES, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Serices 2007-BR4, NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE, its successors and assigns and others
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-159
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
David Goad v. Ronaldo R. Reyes et al
as 5:2022cv00041
Plaintiff: David Goad
Defendant: Ronaldo R. Reyes, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, New Century Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 22-19
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Contant v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-3058
Plaintiff / Appellee: James Contant, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Martin-Han Tran, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carlos Gonzalez, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner / Appellant: AMA Capital Management, LLC
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Petitioner: FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD)
Litovich v. Bank of America Corporation
as 21-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant: Isabel Litovich, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-state Pension Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Holdcraft Marital Trust, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, BofA Securities, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?