Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024mc00010
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Petitioner:
American Resort Development Association
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Petitioner:
American Resort Development Association
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 3:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Petitioner:
American Resort Development Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Wesley Financial Group, LLC et al
as 6:2024mc00003
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC and Charles William McDowell, III
Petitioner:
American Resort Development Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Wesley Financial Group, LLC v. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02361
Plaintiff:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Wesley Financial Group, LLC v. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv02360
Plaintiff:
Wesley Financial Group, LLC
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Primo Management Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC
Defendant:
Primo Management Group, Inc. and Israel Sanchez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Pandora Marketing, LLC, et al
as 2:2021cv03048
Defendant:
Esq. Miranda McCroskey, Pandora Marketing, LLC doing business as Timeshare Compliance, Del Mar Law Group and others
Interested Party:
O'Grady Law Group
Plaintiff:
Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
