Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Rafael Diaz v. USA
as 10-1797
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAFAEL DIAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Brown, Jr. v. Roddi Rushing, et al
as 10-3670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES W. BROWN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RODDI RUSHING, JANE SWOBODA, Law Librarian (CCA), MR. SOWERS, Counselor (Unit A-!) (CCA) and others
Moussaoui et al v. Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009 et al
as 3:2010cv00249
Plaintiff:
Zacarias Moussaoui and Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Hugh M Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company Inc 556 US129 S. Ct2252 173 L. Ed. 2d 1208, 2009, Frank Ricci, John Destefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rushing et al
as 4:2010cv00546
Defendant:
Rushing, Jane Swoboda, Mr. Sowers and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv10352
Petitioner:
Rafael Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Rafael Diaz v. USA
as 09-2483
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAFAEL DIAZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Garcia v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 4:2009cv01928
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Fernando Garcia
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, Daniel Hall, Dana Orenic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz #308565 v. Howes
as 1:2009cv00610
Petitioner:
Miguel Diaz #308565
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Lappin et al
as 4:2008cv01618
Petitioner:
Pedro Diaz
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, John D. Ferguson and Joseph D Gunja
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reyes-Diaz v. USA
as 1:2008cv01395
Respondent:
United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Reyes-Diaz
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
