Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Diaz Torres v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Gilberto Diaz Torres
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Kane et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Kimberly Kane, Christopher Cornell, Wayne Salisbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Lauran Nicholson, Thomas Gulick, Maureen B Keough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Salisbury, et al.
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Wayne Salisbury, Carole Dwyer, Jack Shamks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heather D. v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Heather M Diaz
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Diaz v. Peter F. Neronha
as 1:2021cv00416
Petitioner:
Samuel Diaz
Respondent:
Peter F. Neronha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al.
as 1:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Diaz
Defendant:
Attorney General Peter F. Neronha, Superior Court Mag. Richard Rospallo, Defense Attorney Thomas Gulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
David Curtin, Maureen B Keough, Judy Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2020cv00488
Defendant:
Staff Parkhurst, Officer Mocey, Particia Coyne-Fague and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz v. Nicholson et al
as 1:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Judy Davis, John Flynn, Richard Raspallo and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
