Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams v. Sinclair et al
as 4:2018cv05195
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Stephen Sinclair, Richard Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Noyola v. Steven Hammond, et al
as 18-35350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO NOYOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN HAMMOND, M.D., Chief Medical Officer of the Washington Department of Corrections, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden, Superintendant for Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, DICK MORGAN, Deputy Secretary of Washington Department of Corrections and others
Terrance Irby v. State of Washington, et al
as 18-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRANCE JON IRBY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, BERNARD EDWARD WARNER, DAN PACHOLKE and others
Perez v. Morgan et al
as 3:2016cv06023
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Perez
Defendant:
Dick Morgan, Ron Haynes, Karie Rainer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivas v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05886
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Rivas
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections , Dick Morgan , Bernie Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vallejo-Gonzalez v. Hammond et al
as 3:2016cv05808
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vallejo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Steven G Hammond, Dick Morgan, Jeferey Uttecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2016cv01404
Respondent:
Anmarie Aylward, Dick Morgan, Oregon Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Mario Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald v. Warner et al
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
Scott W McDonald
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Jane Doe Warner, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Morgan et al
as 3:2010cv05638
Plaintiff:
Sky Miller
Defendant:
Dick Morgan, Ron Van Boening, Naiibullah Stoman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
