Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Dickerson
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Jessica R Adkins
Respondent:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalyn Polochak v. Stanley Dickerson
as 23-5863
Petitioner / Appellant:
KALYN MARIE POLOCHAK
Respondent / Appellee:
STANLEY DICKERSON, Warden
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tony Vandee v. Dickerson, et al
as 23-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY LEROY VANDEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DICKERSON, MDOC, JOHN DOE #1, Correctional Officer with MDOC, JOHN DOE #2, Correctional Officer with MDOC and others
West v. Helton et al
as 2:2022cv02877
Plaintiff:
Diane West
Defendant:
Lisa Helton, Stanley Dickerson, Kelley Shakera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vandee #542173 v. Corrigan et al
as 2:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Tony Leroy Vandee #542173
Defendant:
James Corrigan, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronnie Thomas v. E. Hardiman, et al
as 22-1920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE DANTE THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
E. HARDIMAN, Head Library Tech, JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden and J. DICKERSON, Special Act Coordinator
Workman v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Easley Workman, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, Patrick Snyder, Trent Fannin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Dickerson v. USA
as 22-3739
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY RICHARD DICKERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
