Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Barchas v. Diebold Nixdorf Inc.
as 4:2023cv04558
Plaintiff:
Richard K Barchas
Defendant:
Diebold Nixdorf Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. ARxIUM, Inc. et al.
as 5:2023cv02155
Plaintiff:
Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. and Diebold Nixdorf Canada, Limited
Defendant:
ARxIUM, Inc., ARxIUM, Inc. (Canada) and AutoMed Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morado v. Wells Fargo et al
as 5:2022cv00975
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Morado
Defendant:
Bank N.A. Wells Fargo, DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mohamed v. Babkkir et al
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Lokman Mohamed
Defendant:
ESSAM E. BABKKIR, Edirgawi Transport, Inc., Olga Schilk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bradford v. Diebold Nixdorf
as 4:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Jerri Dawn Bradford
Defendant:
Diebold Nixdorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mohamed v. Babkkir et al
as 2:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Lokman Mohamed
Defendant:
Essam E Babkkir and Edirgawi Transport, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Olga Schilk and DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wilbon v. Diebold Nixdorf Inc.
as 3:2021cv00639
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wilbon
Defendant:
Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated and Diebold Nixdorf Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morado v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 5:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
Celilia Morado
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCOM IP, LLC v. DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC.
as 6:2021cv00698
Defendant:
DIEBOLD NIXDORF, INC.
Plaintiff:
MCOM IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
