Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Polyzen, Inc. v. Dielectrics, Inc.
as 3:2017cv30128
Plaintiff:
Polyzen, Inc.
Defendant:
Dielectrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Polyzen, Inc. v. Dielectrics, Inc.
as 3:2015cv13200
Plaintiff:
Polyzen, Inc.
Defendant:
Dielectrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Polyzen, Inc. v. Dielectrics, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13200
Plaintiff:
Polyzen, Inc.
Defendant:
Dielectrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Polyzen, Inc. v. Dielectrics, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Polyzen, Inc.
Defendant:
Dielectrics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv05051
Defendant:
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Alcoa Inc., Allen Foam Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
De Armas, et al v. Industrial Dielectrics, Inc., et al
as 10-1127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR DE ARMAS, by himself and as member of the conjugal partnership de Armas-Colon, MARIA COLON, by herself and as member of the conjugal partnership de Armas-Colon, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP, DE-ARMAS-COLON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
INDUSTRIAL DIELECTRICS, INC. and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
USA v. Abex Aerospace Div, et al
as 2:2000cv12471
Defendant:
ABM CMS, Inc., Abex Aerospace Division, Air Conditioning Co. Inc. and others
Mitutoyo American Corporation:
MTI Engineering Corporation
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
WINSLOW v. BET-ENTEC CHEMICAL CO. et al
as 2:2008cv92114
Plaintiff:
TERRY D WINSLOW
Defendant:
BET-ENTEC CHEMICAL CO., FIBERITE INC, GARLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
De Armas et al v. Industrial Dielectrics, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01746
Plaintiff:
Victor De Armas, Maria Colon, Conjugal Parnership De-Armas-Colon and others
Defendant:
Industrial Dielectrics, Inc., Doe John and Roe Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
