Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Dietz et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv03364
Plaintiff:
Mindy Dietz and Kevin Dietz
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dietz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01420
Plaintiff:
JACKIE DIETZ
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Erin Dietz Mendez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ultimate Cakra Liberation, et al v. Trinity Services Group, Inc., et al
as 22-5789
Plaintiff:
ULTIMATE CAKRA LIBERATION, Tribunal
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya and CHARLES ORLANDO FIELDS, aka Noble:buddha-angavu:sishya
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TROUSDALE TURNER CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
York v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sarah York
Defendant:
Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., Garren Colvin, Gary Blank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13091
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv10810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dietz v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01304
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roberta Dietz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
