Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Okoloji v Danner et al
as 4:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Infells Okoloji
Defendant:
Matthew Danner, Michael Blouch, Martin Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIETZ v. B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2022cv03914
Plaintiff:
JAMES DIETZ
Defendant:
B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC., B. BRAUN INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS INC. and B. BRAUN MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
White v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
JohnJuan White
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIETZ v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01239
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DIETZ
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00027
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
HILL-JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv01391
Defendant:
CHRISTY FOREMAN, STEPHEN BEGLER, UNKNOWN ATF AGENT and others
Plaintiff:
DACLON HILL-JOHNSON and DAELON HILL-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04704
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COTTO v. DIETZ & WATSON, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04078
Defendant:
DIETZ & WATSON, INC., ROBERT REISER & CO., INC. and AMERICAN FOOD EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY COTTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
